<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Graph Forums — Logistic trendline]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?id=106</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.padowan.dk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=106&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Logistic trendline.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=372#p372</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When the R^2&gt;1, something <em>is</em> wrong, so that should at least be one test criterion...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (k-ryeng)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=372#p372</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=370#p370</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I will consider it. But sometimes it is difficult to determine the difference between a wrong result and a model that just doesn&#039;t fit the data very well. But I think I can at least give a warning.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ivan Johansen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=370#p370</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=369#p369</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, good to know that it actually works. But it would be nice if you could implement an error message when R^2&gt;1, and ask the user to change the initial values to obtain a more reliable result. It&#039;s better to get no result than getting wrong result...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (k-ryeng)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=369#p369</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=367#p367</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the default guess of $a=1, $b=1, $c=1 seems to be too far away from the points for Graph to use it. If you change the guess to $a=100, $b=10, $c=1 it seems to work.</p><p>I hope to improve this in the future so Graph can provide the initial guess.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ivan Johansen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=367#p367</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=363#p363</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I used the following datapoints, picked from an example in our book:<br />x&nbsp; &nbsp; y<br />0&nbsp; &nbsp; 10<br />10&nbsp; &nbsp; 18<br />20&nbsp; &nbsp; 38<br />30&nbsp; &nbsp; 64<br />40&nbsp; &nbsp; 90<br />50&nbsp; &nbsp; 110<br />60&nbsp; &nbsp; 118</p><p>I also tried to change the constants, but it didn&#039;t affect the result, unless I chose $a or $c=0, then it wouldn&#039;t find any result.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (k-ryeng)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=363#p363</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=355#p355</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It is most likely because that is the best result Graph can find, but I can check what happens if you post your data points.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ivan Johansen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=355#p355</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=354#p354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with this. I have tried to put in the function f(x)=$a/(1+$b*exp(-$c*x)), (which is the form our curriculum applies for the logistic model), but I only get f(x) = 1/(1+e^-x) as result.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (k-ryeng)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=354#p354</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=271#p271</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am a little unsure what you want. As far as I know a logistic function always have the formula f(x)=1/(1+e^-x). But if you change it a little you can for example create f(x)=$a/($b+e^-x) as a model for a custom trendline.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ivan Johansen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=271#p271</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Logistic trendline]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=270#p270</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to make a logistic trendline?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Exutu)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.padowan.dk/viewtopic.php?pid=270#p270</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
